Different sync settings need to be on a different channel set to avoid 
interference. 

But that does not limit the use of differing configurations beyond a single 
group. 

> On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:14 AM, "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> How does sync work if I have a 50/50 and a 75/25 radio on the same tower?
> 
> 
> Matt Hoppes
> Director of Information Technology
> Indigo Wireless
> +1 (570) 723-7312
> 
>> On 8/8/14, 10:12 AM, Jaime Fink wrote:
>> GPS and GLONASS receiver are hard integrated in every product, the
>> addition of the 2nd satellite network significantly increases reception,
>> and the receiver is strategically places at the top of the enclosure for
>> clearest reception. 
>> 
>> The implementation is integrated with an advanced custom GPSDO for 1PPS
>> high precision, and radio groups A/B across the network of Mimosa radios
>> switch TX/RX  on the GPS epoch rise and fall.  
>> 
>> TDMA sync modes allow 50/50 split or 75/25 split for enhanced
>> downstream, and window size adjustability from 2-8ms to optimize speed
>> versus latency choices. 
>> 
>> For non sync modes, auto TDMA adjusts up/down dynamically and avoids
>> fixing the bandwidth. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Jaime
>> 
>> On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:02 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>> How does Mimosa get GPS Sync? Does it have a GPS receiver built into
>>> every radio or is there an external source?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>> 
>>> Wavelinc Communications
>>> 
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>> 
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>> 
>>> http://www.wavelinc.com <http://www.wavelinc.com/>
>>> 
>>> tel. 419-562-6405
>>> 
>>> fax. 419-617-0110
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Matt Hoppes
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    I totally understand, Steve.
>>> 
>>>    What I'm saying is now you have folks throwing up 5GHz 40MHz
>>>    backhauls.... ewwwww.  I guess we'll say.  It's nice the options
>>>    are out
>>>    there, but I wish they could be saved for use in the hands of
>>>    WISPs only.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>    On 8/6/14, 2:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>>>> Matt, nausea can be fixed with realism. I have used nothing but
>>>    5GHz backhauls for 8 years. Only in the last 2 years have we gone
>>>    to any 5 GHz Client other than business.  I have 15 towers and
>>>    each has at least 2 paths in and out for redundancy.  So that is
>>>    35+ Links.  Most are 5 miles or more so not an AF24 candidate in
>>>    my rain zone.  I can't afford to just go out and buy $175,000
>>>    worth of licensed backhauls.  But for the price of one Licensed
>>>    link I can buy 2.5- 5GHz links (AF5, Mimosa, or whoever)  saving
>>>    me $100,000 when all is said and done.
>>>> 
>>>> Would I prefer to do all licensed and save all the 5GHz for
>>>    Customer?  Heck Yes!!  But that is not the reality I live in.
>>>> 
>>>> Steve Barnes
>>>> General Manager
>>>> PCSWIN.com <http://PCSWIN.com>
>>>> Howard LLC.
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>    [mailto:[email protected]
>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:03 PM
>>>> To: WISPA General List
>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working)
>>>> 
>>>> I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>>> Higher one way throughput.
>>>>> More channels to choose from.
>>>>> DFS hit doesn't take your link down.
>>>>> External antennas.
>>>>> Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things
>>>>> that vary like X-pol and F/B.
>>>>> Lower power consumption.
>>>>> Standard PoE.
>>>>> Etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>    <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentC
>>>    omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-
>>>>> computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]
>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]
>>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working)
>>>>> 
>>>>> THanks Josh!
>>>>> I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light?
>>>>> 
>>>>> H/V instead of cross-slant antennas.
>>>>> Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber.
>>>>> And latency is higher than an airFiber
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's the "amazing" thing about this new device?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiP
>>>>> OTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> submit comments for approval / additions please
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart,
>>>    and some
>>>>>> of it I'm lazy on.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal /
>>>>>> channel width table
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any
>>>    results of
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive).
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    Wireless mailing list
>>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to