It syncs those systems within systems of the same parameters. Changing the 
parameters requires more traditional RF planning. Same thing on Canopy, WiMax, 
etc., etc. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> 
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 9:13:54 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 

How does sync work if I have a 50/50 and a 75/25 radio on the same tower? 


Matt Hoppes 
Director of Information Technology 
Indigo Wireless 
+1 (570) 723-7312 

On 8/8/14, 10:12 AM, Jaime Fink wrote: 
> GPS and GLONASS receiver are hard integrated in every product, the 
> addition of the 2nd satellite network significantly increases reception, 
> and the receiver is strategically places at the top of the enclosure for 
> clearest reception. 
> 
> The implementation is integrated with an advanced custom GPSDO for 1PPS 
> high precision, and radio groups A/B across the network of Mimosa radios 
> switch TX/RX on the GPS epoch rise and fall. 
> 
> TDMA sync modes allow 50/50 split or 75/25 split for enhanced 
> downstream, and window size adjustability from 2-8ms to optimize speed 
> versus latency choices. 
> 
> For non sync modes, auto TDMA adjusts up/down dynamically and avoids 
> fixing the bandwidth. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Jaime 
> 
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:02 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 
> 
>> How does Mimosa get GPS Sync? Does it have a GPS receiver built into 
>> every radio or is there an external source? 
>> 
>> 
>> Kurt Fankhauser 
>> 
>> Wavelinc Communications 
>> 
>> P.O. Box 126 
>> 
>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 
>> 
>> http://www.wavelinc.com <http://www.wavelinc.com/> 
>> 
>> tel. 419-562-6405 
>> 
>> fax. 419-617-0110 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Matt Hoppes 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 
>> 
>> I totally understand, Steve. 
>> 
>> What I'm saying is now you have folks throwing up 5GHz 40MHz 
>> backhauls.... ewwwww. I guess we'll say. It's nice the options 
>> are out 
>> there, but I wish they could be saved for use in the hands of 
>> WISPs only. 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/6/14, 2:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: 
>> > Matt, nausea can be fixed with realism. I have used nothing but 
>> 5GHz backhauls for 8 years. Only in the last 2 years have we gone 
>> to any 5 GHz Client other than business. I have 15 towers and 
>> each has at least 2 paths in and out for redundancy. So that is 
>> 35+ Links. Most are 5 miles or more so not an AF24 candidate in 
>> my rain zone. I can't afford to just go out and buy $175,000 
>> worth of licensed backhauls. But for the price of one Licensed 
>> link I can buy 2.5- 5GHz links (AF5, Mimosa, or whoever) saving 
>> me $100,000 when all is said and done. 
>> > 
>> > Would I prefer to do all licensed and save all the 5GHz for 
>> Customer? Heck Yes!! But that is not the reality I live in. 
>> > 
>> > Steve Barnes 
>> > General Manager 
>> > PCSWIN.com <http://PCSWIN.com> 
>> > Howard LLC. 
>> > 
>> > -----Original Message----- 
>> > From: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> [mailto:[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:03 PM 
>> > To: WISPA General List 
>> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 
>> > 
>> > I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 
>> >> Higher one way throughput. 
>> >> More channels to choose from. 
>> >> DFS hit doesn't take your link down. 
>> >> External antennas. 
>> >> Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things 
>> >> that vary like X-pol and F/B. 
>> >> Lower power consumption. 
>> >> Standard PoE. 
>> >> Etc. 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> ----- 
>> >> Mike Hammett 
>> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> >> http://www.ics-il.com 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentC 
>> >> 
>> omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent- 
>> >> computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> >> -- 
>> >> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> >> *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM 
>> >> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) 
>> >> 
>> >> THanks Josh! 
>> >> I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light? 
>> >> 
>> >> H/V instead of cross-slant antennas. 
>> >> Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber. 
>> >> And latency is higher than an airFiber 
>> >> 
>> >> What's the "amazing" thing about this new device? 
>> >> 
>> >> On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 
>> >>> 
>> >> 
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiP 
>> >> OTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing 
>> >>> 
>> >>> submit comments for approval / additions please 
>> >>> 
>> >>> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart, 
>> and some 
>> >>> of it I'm lazy on. 
>> >>> 
>> >>> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal / 
>> >>> channel width table 
>> >>> 
>> >>> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any 
>> results of 
>> >>> an 
>> >>> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive). 
>> >>> 
>> >> _______________________________________________ 
>> >> Wireless mailing list 
>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> _______________________________________________ 
>> >> Wireless mailing list 
>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> >> 
>> > _______________________________________________ 
>> > Wireless mailing list 
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> > _______________________________________________ 
>> > Wireless mailing list 
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> > 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Wireless mailing list 
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Wireless mailing list 
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to