And GLONASS works better than GPS in higher northern latitudes (aka:
Alaska) :P
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 08/08/2014 06:12 AM, Jaime Fink wrote:
GPS and GLONASS receiver are hard integrated in every product, the
addition of the 2nd satellite network significantly increases
reception, and the receiver is strategically places at the top of the
enclosure for clearest reception.
The implementation is integrated with an advanced custom GPSDO for
1PPS high precision, and radio groups A/B across the network of Mimosa
radios switch TX/RX on the GPS epoch rise and fall.
TDMA sync modes allow 50/50 split or 75/25 split for enhanced
downstream, and window size adjustability from 2-8ms to optimize speed
versus latency choices.
For non sync modes, auto TDMA adjusts up/down dynamically and avoids
fixing the bandwidth.
Cheers,
Jaime
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:02 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <li...@wavelinc.com
<mailto:li...@wavelinc.com>> wrote:
How does Mimosa get GPS Sync? Does it have a GPS receiver built into
every radio or is there an external source?
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com <http://www.wavelinc.com/>
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Matt Hoppes
<mhop...@indigowireless.com <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> wrote:
I totally understand, Steve.
What I'm saying is now you have folks throwing up 5GHz 40MHz
backhauls.... ewwwww. I guess we'll say. It's nice the options
are out
there, but I wish they could be saved for use in the hands of
WISPs only.
On 8/6/14, 2:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
> Matt, nausea can be fixed with realism. I have used nothing but
5GHz backhauls for 8 years. Only in the last 2 years have we gone
to any 5 GHz Client other than business. I have 15 towers and
each has at least 2 paths in and out for redundancy. So that is
35+ Links. Most are 5 miles or more so not an AF24 candidate in
my rain zone. I can't afford to just go out and buy $175,000
worth of licensed backhauls. But for the price of one Licensed
link I can buy 2.5- 5GHz links (AF5, Mimosa, or whoever) saving
me $100,000 when all is said and done.
>
> Would I prefer to do all licensed and save all the 5GHz for
Customer? Heck Yes!! But that is not the reality I live in.
>
> Steve Barnes
> General Manager
> PCSWIN.com <http://PCSWIN.com>
> Howard LLC.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:03 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working)
>
> I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous.
>
>
>
> On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> Higher one way throughput.
>> More channels to choose from.
>> DFS hit doesn't take your link down.
>> External antennas.
>> Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things
>> that vary like X-pol and F/B.
>> Lower power consumption.
>> Standard PoE.
>> Etc.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentC
>>
omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-
>> computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com
<mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>
>> *To: *"WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working)
>>
>> THanks Josh!
>> I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light?
>>
>> H/V instead of cross-slant antennas.
>> Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber.
>> And latency is higher than an airFiber
>>
>> What's the "amazing" thing about this new device?
>>
>> On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiP
>> OTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> submit comments for approval / additions please
>>>
>>> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart,
and some
>>> of it I'm lazy on.
>>>
>>> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal /
>>> channel width table
>>>
>>> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any
results of
>>> an
>>> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive).
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless