Don't you think they will throttle us also... Make us pay for fast lane just like their other customers... only worst for us.. think ESPN
Don't misunderstand me... I don't like the net neutrality as its being proposed, but I also don't want some services favored over others and forced to pay more the get them equal. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality Rules Until 2015" Is there any more information on what exactly the FCC is proposing to propose? I know there was Title II thrown around.... How would that impact us, or any other carrier? Net neutrality is about giving all packets equal access -- if I already do that, do I have anything to fear? I for one would love to see Net neutrality fall on its face, the big ISPs start throtteling traffic, and just have customers driven to us little guys who don't throttle. On 11/11/14, 8:33 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > from: > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/11/11/2345213/fcc-confirms-delay-of-new-net-neutrality-rules-until-2015 > > "/The Federal Communications Commission will abandon > <http://www.dailydot.com/politics/net-neutrality-fcc-tom-wheeler-delayed-obama/> > > its earlier > promise > <https://www.fcc.gov/blog/setting-record-straight-fcc-s-open-internet-rules> > to > make a decision on new net neutrality rules this year. Instead, FCC > Press Secretary Kim Hart said, "there will not be a vote on open > internet rules on the December meeting agenda. That would mean rules > would now be finalized in 2015." The FCC's confirmation of the delay > came just as President Barack Obama launched a campaign > <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/10/statement-president-net-neutrality> > > to > persuade the agency to reclassify broadband Internet service as a public > utility./Opensource.com is also running an interview with a legal > advisor at the FCC > <http://opensource.com/government/14/11/fcc-advisor-talks-net-neutrality>. > He says, "There will be a burden on providers. The question is, 'Is that > burden justified?' And I think our answer is 'Yes.'"" > -- > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
