Crownception.

On Jan 26, 2017 9:23 PM, "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Department of redundancy department?
>
> On 1/26/17 6:55 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > Crown is just the latest in a series of fiber-related acquisitions Crown
> > has done.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Mike Hammett
> >
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+
> IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.
> com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >
> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.
> linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://
> twitter.com/mdwestix>
> >
> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.
> youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]>
> > *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> > *Sent: *Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:40:46 AM
> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] What my spies are talking about
> >
> >
> >
> > Just to add to that....
> >
> > a) Take all what Brian said below, and add to it the fact that, in many
> > cities they are very quietly installing Micro-Pops, every few blocks,
> > fiber feed (essentially replacing street light poles with, poles which
> > are light poles and micropops).
> >
> > b) The noise and developments in LTE-U
> >
> > c) The very strange, over-priced acquisition of FPL-Fibernet by Crown
> Castle
> >
> > d) Relatively quite conversion, installation of GPON system on every
> > building that ATT had a Metro Ethernet presence in.
> >
> > e) Hype and noise about Gigabit fiber delivery, installation of fiber
> > based service in select areas, ATT Conversion of their select IFTL
> > neighborhoods to Gigabit fiber..
> >
> > f) The rumblings about Cable Co's moving over the Docsis 3
> >
> > Granted that this is not ubiquitous across the nation.. but I can see
> > the competitive service providers could easily be starved out by the
> > choke hold on being able to deliver/buy/have access to  fat pipe
> > especially in the middle mile.
> >
> > I think in most major metro areas the perceived minimum base level of
> > service offering is going to hit high triple digit numbers in terms of
> > bandwidth i.e. 200meg,300meg,500meg etc... we are already seeing
> > customer expectations  /  perceptions around 100meg.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Faisal Imtiaz
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom
> > 7266 SW 48 Street
> > Miami, FL 33155
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> >
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Brian Webster" <[email protected]>
> >> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:46:38 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] What my spies are talking about
> >
> >> Remember, Verizon bought XO Communications. XO has 24 GHz and 39 GHz
> >> spectrum over most of the country, so now Verizon owns that spectrum.
> They
> >> seem to be taking the same approach Windstream and Google are for last
> > mile
> >> connectivity, but Verizon owns the spectrum. Windstream is leasing
> > spectrum
> >> in these same bands from Straightpath (http://straightpath39.com/) and
> >> Google is looking to build in 70 and 80 GHz with E-Band licenses.  All
> of
> >> the sudden the WISP industry looks good enough for the big boys to do it
> >> too. Cambridge Networks has PTMP radios for these bands already, 600
> > meg per
> >> sector. Hang them on the fiber at the pole and create a very small
> > cell type
> >> system. This will work great for backhaul on their Pico cellular network
> >> expansion for LTE/Cellular as well as a good tool for FTTH and Business
> >> class circuits.
> >>
> >> http://cbnl.com/vectastar-600
> >>
> >> http://cbnl.com/vectastar-platform-introduction
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank You,
> >> Brian Webster
> >> www.wirelessmapping.com
> >> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:19 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] What my spies are talking about
> >>
> >> On 1/25/2017 11:58 AM, Marco Coelho wrote:
> >>> Some of my friends at Verizon are talking a major shift in their Fiber
> >>> Deployment.
> >>> They have decided Fiber to the Home is non practical.  They have
> >>> adopted a fiber to the pedestal scheme with the last part of the
> >>> connectivity being wireless to the home.  Details on bands used have
> >>> not been provided, but that is apparently their new model. They have
> >>> sold their copper plant in Texas to Frontier as a part of this plan.
> >>> Interesting times.
> >>
> >> That's right.  FiOS is basically over, for new builds. Too expensive.
> > It is
> >> mostly down to some FTTPR (fiber to the press release). They told Boston
> >> that they would build FiOS there. Lots of good press last year.
> >> But they actually had built out some neighborhoods about a decade ago,
> and
> >> simply not activated it. So now they're activating it and claiming it's
> a
> >> new build. But in the meantime they are planning massive densification
> of
> >> their wireless capacity, using street light poles, and basically just
> >> building fiber to the pole. They've told this to Wall Street; they
> haven't
> >> made it clear to the locals.
> >>
> >> While 4G meant LTE, 5G apparently just means "whatever we do after
> > deploying
> >> LTE, because 5 comes after 4".
> >>
> >> ATT has this "IP transition" plan which doesn't have much to do with IP.
> >> It basically means they're abandoning most of the copper, updating some
> >> short loops to U-Verse, and putting in a lot more wireless to replace
> the
> >> copper. It's not fiber speed but it's cheap. Both AT&T and Verizon are
> > very
> >> very interested in 3.5 GHz CBRS, as well as millimeter wave for where
> that
> >> works. You may recall that a few months ago, AT&T announced a plan to
> put
> >> millimeter wave backhaul on top of utility poles, beaming pole to pole
> >> (about half a mile), and using the electrical wires as a sort of
> waveguide
> >> to help the signal.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>  Fred R. Goldstein      k1io    fred "at" interisle.net
> >>  Interisle Consulting Group
> >>  +1 617 795 2701
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wireless mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireless mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireless mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to