On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
> Care to fix it?
The only thing I could do is to revert the patch. Should I do that?
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
