On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:04:31AM +0200, Peter Johansson wrote:
> Oh, I see. Sorry, must have missed that before.
> What Jaap writes in
> http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200604/msg00097.html is true,
> however IMHO I see no reason why not to fix this problem in this file
> (packet-tcp.h) right now. Why let Wireshark be
> Windows-app-development-a-like (you have to inlcude windows.h before
> including winsock2.h)?
> But I guess that it should be added to the Wiki wishlist that cleaning
> up include dependencies is a task to perform for anyone at will...
Personally, I like to include everything manually.
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
