Hi Steve,
It was discussed in the thread with Guy (http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg02454.html) ... Regards, Sebastien Tandel >> re-post of a patch described here ... >> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html >> > > Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an > RVAL()? It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so. > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
