Richard van der Hoff wrote: > The H.223 dissector contains code to deal with "bitswapped" captures - > ie, where all of the bytes have their bits backwards. It seems that this > is much better handled as a separate dissector entry point, so that the > right one can be chosen when the dissector is registered, rather than > the current dubious heuristics.
So in what cases are the bytes bitswapped, other than H.223-over-IAX? And is there any need to have two separate protocols, rather than two separate dissectors for the same protocol (namely H.223)? _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
