Luis Ontanon wrote: > the point is what kind of warnings can be cleaned up: > > to fix "pointer arguments differ in signedness" for example would be > a waste of time, as they are caused by guint8* used instaed of gchar* > on those systems (most) that treat char as an unsigned.
Actually GCC already has a way to avoid this: "-Wno-pointer-sign". Apparently: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00505.html someone didn't like the fact that Linux had a few thousand such warnings when compiled with GCC 4. We could add that and probably cut down the number of GCC warnings by, well, a few thousand. Unfortunately I can't quite seem to figure out how to (correctly) test if GCC will accept the option, though. Any ideas? _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
