Should the XML dissector have a port (range) preference? Would be
easier than LUA...
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> No, it would be enough to have the XML dissector register for the
> given port in the tcp.port table.
>
> Or have the heuristic dissector register for TCP, but that would be expensive.
>
> -- lua snipplet that registers XML on tcp port 12345
> DissectorTable.get("tcp.port"):add(12345, Dissector.get("xml"));
>
>
>
> On 8/2/07, Rick Gudmundson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suppose I've got a protocol that is simply XML running over TCP. I know that
>> Wireshark is capable of dissecting XML data from HTTP packets, etc. What's
>> the shortest/easiest way to dissect a conversation just as XML? Does it
>> require a new XML dissector?
>>
>> Rick
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
