Done. At a glance, I don't think the installation of the plugins is optional - could someone verify this? I can't test the win32 installer until I get home tonight...
On 10/11/07, Anders Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If it's going to be built in can't it have it's own directory together > with Diameter, Radius etc so we don't have to move it later? > > Regards > > Anders > > > ------------------------------ > > *Från:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *För *Martin Mathieson > *Skickat:* den 11 oktober 2007 19:15 > *Till:* [email protected] > *Ämne:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1903] wimaxasncp: > TLVsdefined in XML files > > > > > > On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1903 > > > ------- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-11 > 09:34 GMT ------- > Just to be clear - I was thinking of people having the flexibility to > offer the > very latest plugin code (taken from the main svn repo) with a stable > release of > Wireshark (perhaps supplied by their distro). > > Rather than people distributing private modifications of the plugin. > > Anyway, the updated plugin has had some more testing. Can we decide now > where > the XML file should be installed (I don't think this patch changed > wireshark.nsi...) ? > > > Any ideas what to do with this? The patched version seems to work > equivalently to the current version that doesn't use XML for the TLVs. The > immediate issue seems to be where the XML should be installed. It is > currently written (during a 'make install' to the data direction, e.g. on > my machine here /usr/local/share/wireshark/plugins/wimaxasncp). Should it > instead go in the plugins folder with the plugin itself? I couldn't find > any other precedents for plugins installing extra files. Does this seem to > be acceptable? If so, I'll add the entry needed to wireshark.nsi and check > it in tomorrow. > > I don't think anyone disagrees that it can become a built-in dissector > once it and the WiMAX standard matures a bit more. > > Regards, > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
