Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi list, > > I've stumbled upon c-ares (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/) as a > possible replacement for ADNS, which we currently have as async DNS resolver > library. > Pro's: Still being developed, IPv6 support, multi-platform, MIT license. > Con's: May suffer from same memory allocation issues on Win32 as does ADNS. > > Does anyone have further insights into the use of this library?
It looks interesting. The fact that it's documented and actively developed is encouraging. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
