Hi, Looking at the suggestions I see this: Poslib seems to have been developed until 2005, similar problem as ADNS. It's a C++ lib as well, causing a binding problem. UDNS looks interesting as well. As it's conceptual model is further from ADNS than c-ares is it might take more work to get it interfaced. Another thing not apparent is the cross platform support. There is mention of a Win32 port, but that is stated to be out of date.
Thanx, Jaap Graham Bloice wrote: > Gerald Combs wrote: >> Jaap Keuter wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I've stumbled upon c-ares (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/) as a >>> possible replacement for ADNS, which we currently have as async DNS >>> resolver >>> library. >>> Pro's: Still being developed, IPv6 support, multi-platform, MIT license. >>> Con's: May suffer from same memory allocation issues on Win32 as does ADNS. >>> >>> Does anyone have further insights into the use of this library? >>> >> >> It looks interesting. The fact that it's documented and actively developed is >> encouraging. >> _______________________________________________ >> > It also has some Freexxx() functions that seem to handle freeing > allocations that the lib makes. > > From the web site, they also have a link to other similar libs, Poslib > (http://posadis.sourceforge.net/) and UDNS > (http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/udns.html) look interesting. > > -- > Regards, > > Graham Bloice > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
