2008/12/23 Martin Mathieson <[email protected]>

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Yuming fang <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I register the dissector for the LTE data with the "tcp.port"
>> dissector table with the value 9999. And now I could get the LTE data from
>> the 9999 port. Do I just add  my LTE code into the corresponding functions,
>> such as the function of dissect_LET to parse the LTE date?  Could you give
>> me some information about the APIs(in wireshark) which could display the LTE
>> data headers as layers in wireshark?(I want to display these headers like
>> layers)
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Yuming
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hi Yuming,
>
> Which LTE data headers are you referring to?  I'm planning to check in my
> LTE MAC dissector tonight.  RLC is almost ready (hopefully early next year)
> and I have a PDCP dissector that I need to tidy up a little and add a couple
> more ROHC profiles to.
>


At present, I want to check the LTE MAC dissector. Could you give me
some information about your solution of checking the code through wireshark?



>
> Note that Wireshark already has support for several LTE signalling
> protocols (S1AP, X2AP, RRC, NAS), and and although they're not normally
> carried over TCP I'm sure we could allow them to be decoded over a
> configured TCP port.
>


I see some code about the RRC in wireshark. It seems we could not decode the
LTE data directly because there is no LTE card. So I want to decode the LTE
data through a configured TCP port(At present we use the port 9999 as a
test.). But how could my LTE code be added into this
dissector(tcp.port=9999) perfectly? Could you give me some suggestions?

Thank you!

Best wishes,
Yuming



>
> Martin
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
>>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>             mailto:[email protected]
>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>             mailto:[email protected]
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to