On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:38:29PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> It is of little use to keep single file dissectors as plugins. Also little or
> no
> development is going into these. In order to cut down the number of plugins
> these are incorporated into the build in collection.
> What is left is:
> 1. gryphon, as the most senior plugin providing an example for new developers.
> It is referenced in doc/README.plugins.
> 2. Multiple file dissector plugins (like profinet) are left as they are, since
> the explicit collection of relevant source files has its pros.
IIRC, the rudp dissector was left in because it was a very simple dissector
that could act as a trivial example on how to implement such a thing.
Maybe you could restore it?
Apart from that: I'm very happy with your move as it slightly accelerates
the build and install processes.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
