Hi, Gryphon is now the example used. Also referred in README.plugins
Thanx, Jaap Sent from my iPhone On 25 feb 2009, at 17:16, Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:38:29PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote: >> It is of little use to keep single file dissectors as plugins. Also >> little or no >> development is going into these. In order to cut down the number of >> plugins >> these are incorporated into the build in collection. >> What is left is: >> 1. gryphon, as the most senior plugin providing an example for new >> developers. >> It is referenced in doc/README.plugins. >> 2. Multiple file dissector plugins (like profinet) are left as they >> are, since >> the explicit collection of relevant source files has its pros. > > IIRC, the rudp dissector was left in because it was a very simple > dissector > that could act as a trivial example on how to implement such a thing. > Maybe you could restore it? > Apart from that: I'm very happy with your move as it slightly > accelerates > the build and install processes. > > ciao > Joerg > > > -- > Joerg Mayer <[email protected] > > > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff > that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
