On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:29:42PM +0000, Richard van der Hoff wrote: > I'm not quite up-to-speed with the problems here: is the problem that we > have some GPLv2-only parts and some GPLv3-only parts? I'm not sure that > that is a new problem, is it?
Wireshark binaries should be under a "GPLv2 or newer" license, not a "GPLv2" license. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
