Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:29:42PM +0000, Richard van der Hoff wrote: >> I'm not quite up-to-speed with the problems here: is the problem that we >> have some GPLv2-only parts and some GPLv3-only parts? I'm not sure that >> that is a new problem, is it? > > Wireshark binaries should be under a "GPLv2 or newer" license, not a > "GPLv2" license.
Ok, so how does that tie in with COPYING saying "Wireshark is distributed under the GNU GPLv2?" I suppose that's true, but the implication is that it therefore *cannot* be distributed under GPLv3. It would be nice if this were clearer IMHO. -- Richard van der Hoff <[email protected]> Project Manager Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778 http://www.mxtelecom.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
