Hey, Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > Is that on top of Rev 28909?
No, rev 28909 [1] fixes this issue. You can ignore my patch. Thanks. [1] http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=28909 -- Best regards, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
