Graham

I completely rebooted my machine (just to make sure I was not using the 
same command prompt)...tried again (it chugged along for a while)...
then it broke. Remember...I am not even trying the 64 bit stuff yet.

All I am trying to do is check out the new source and build the 32 bit 
version before I jump into the 64 bit stuff again.

The reason I had updat source is because what Gerald stated.....in my 
old source tree in the config.namke file it specified that "only" 32 bit 
was available.

So this is where I am at.....I will continue to try and track down why 
this is not working before I completely break a perfect environment that 
works with old sources.

Also....this is what I did for the old sources......it defiantly doesn't 
work if I do not do this....but are these steps in right order...???

First prepare command prompt:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin>vcvars32.bat

Run the perl programs in a Cygwin terminal:
cd C:
cd wireshark-<version>

$ perl make-version.pl
$ perl perlnoutf.pl make-authors-short.pl < AUTHORS > AUTHORS-SHORT
$ perl perlnoutf.pl make-authors-format.pl < AUTHORS-SHORT > 
AUTHORS-SHORT-FORMAT

(go to "prepaired"cmd window)

cd to wireshark
then do
nmake -f Makefile.nmake all

Do you have to do this when you build....????

Anyway.....here is the error that I am getting:

 perl perlnoutf.pl make-authors-short.pl < ../AUTHORS > AUTHORS-SHORT
  24275 [main] perl 3980 child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed, 
0xBD2000
..0xBD2370, done 0, windows pid 3980, Win32 error 487

Any ideas why make-authors-short.pl appears to be breaking....???

In the meantime...if you think of anything else...please let me know.

Thanks,
Brian




Graham Bloice wrote:
> Brian Oleksa wrote:
>> Graham
>>
>> What is weird about the hole thing is that I kept my "old" sources in 
>> tact just in case the new sources blow up (like they did).
>>
>> I can still build the old sources using the current set up on this same 
>> machine.
>>
>> Plus I can also run "verify tools" with no problem with the new source 
>> code...but as soon as I build it....it blows up.
>>
>> I am hoping wireshark is not that finicky between different source 
>> trees...???
>>
>> I guess I will take you advice and uninstall perl and reinstall it (or 
>> something).....but again....the perl that is installed works fine with 
>> my older source tree build....
>> so why wouldn't it work fine with they new source tree build...????
>>
>> I followed the directions to the "T" other than reinstalling all the 
>> apps again...(like perl, python, cygwin...etc)...as there should not be 
>> a need to as they do indeed already work.
>>
>> Just wanted to see what your thoughts where before I start messing with 
>> things that appear to be working correctly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian
> I only have one source tree that I compile in, but I can't see why 
> there should be problems with more than one.  Something is causing 
> problems with perl execution, maybe you could track down what that is 
> rather than just wipe out and re-install.  I don't know what it could 
> be, possibly a cygwin problem?
>
> Just checking that you are closing the command prompt and opening a 
> new one and running the appropriate vcvarsxxx.bat before building the 
> different versions?  You can't use one command prompt for both.
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Graham Bloice
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to