Hi, Yes, because these are real bugs.
Thanx, Jaap Send from my iPhone On 27 sep 2009, at 21:50, didier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009 à 14:30 -0700, Guy Harris a écrit : >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 11:38 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29427 >>> >>> User: krj >>> Date: 2009/08/14 11:38 PM >>> >>> Log: >>> This patch introduces packet_add_new_data_source() which effectively >>> deprecates add_new_data_source(). This is based on the following >>> observation: >>> >>> 1) The tvb + name (aka. data_source) is only used when the protocol >>> tree is visible >> >> Nope. It's also used, for example, by "tshark -x", even if "-V" >> isn't >> specified. There may be other places where it's used as well. > Hum, does it means that all dissectors using > if (tree) {...; call_dissector(data_handle,...) } > > Have to be modified? > Didier > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
