Hello, this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does several things at once. With git, I could commit each patch (which is done locally) and eventually push all commits to the central repository while maintaing the indivitual character of the commits. I don't like git very much, but that's what various projects I'm tracking use, so that's why I propose the use of git. Also - if I'm not mistaken - some people seem to use tortoise and that tool seems to have git support.
Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe