Here's one that's not yet supported: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200805/msg00058.html I've never had the time to work on it and likely never will at this point. - Chris
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Ludemann Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Hi! Are there any dissectors that are in any particular need of re-writing or re-working? I've been working on a higher level protocol specification format (http://www.protocollogic.com/), and would like to try it out with some more protocols (with the possibility that the resultant decoder may be put to use, instead of just as a logical exercise). I've used it to (partially) decode several formats, some binary (jpeg, pdf, ber asn.1), some text based (that are highly structured). The constructs are loosely based on ASN.1. Protocol suggestions & flames welcome! Cheers, Henry ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
