No, thank you! - Chris -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Ludemann Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:26 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking?
On 9 February 2010 23:46, Maynard, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's one that's not yet supported: > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200805/msg00058.html > I've never had the time to work on it and likely never will at this > point. Sounds interesting... having tests available is useful (https://fi.dev.java.net/source/browse/fi/RoundTripTests/). Thanks! ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
