Hi,
I like it!
Can you provide an example use of the new value_string_ext as well?
Regards
Anders
Jakub Zawadzki skrev 2010-04-26 21:13:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32:16PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
like a full table starting at a number ( like 500 - 1000 ->value match index
minus
offset).
Uhm, sounds complicated :)
Maybe we can initialize match_type in proto_register_field_init()
so developer don't need to care if it's sorted or no...
We can do it also during first use of match_strval_fast() (which might be
better option)
Attaching patch, btw. I changed _fast to _ext.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
