Gerald, Do you have a specific hard cutoff date for patch submissions for the 1.4 release? I'm currently working on trying to get at least the main AVB (Audio Video Bridging) protocols integrated into the main branch and it would be great if they made it into 1.4. The reason being alot of major companies who are actively developing products using AVB are eagerly awaiting the submission of my dissectors so they can use them as well. I've submitted one just yesterday which looks good based on feedback I have gotten. Another one incorporates really minor changes into the existing 1588 dissector (packet-ptp). And the final one is also a new dissector, but one my company has been maintaining for over a year now so it has also already been extensively tested. I'm asking because I want to know whether I should drop everything else and quickly get the outstanding two finished like today, or maybe by EOB Friday if at all?
Thanks, -Torrey ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Broman [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 Maynard, Chris skrev 2010-05-12 03:38: > Hi Gerald, > > What of the patches that have been submitted but not yet checked in? I > understand that it's time-consuming to review patches and that some of the > submitted ones may need to be re-worked and not quite ready, etc., but a > quick bugzilla search indicates that 111 bugs (~21% of them) have patches > submitted as attachments, a good portion of them likely waiting for > "review_for_checkin?". It would be nice if those patches that are ready for > integration could make it into 1.4 or those patches submitted could at least > be "grand-fathered" into the 1.4 branch so one wouldn't have to wait an > entire year (or more?) until 1.6 for the patch to become part of the next > stable release. It's one thing to not want to add new protocols or major > changes to the stable release, but surely many of them are not "enhancement" > bugs or major rewrites of the capture core and would be suitable for > inclusion. No? What are your thoughts I think any one on the dev list could help speed things up by helping reviewing patches especially if they need rework. Regards Anders > on this? > > Thanks, > Chris > P.S. Here's a very simple patch that would be nice (for me) to get added: > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4722 :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7:41 PM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 > > I'd like to create a branch for 1.4 in the next week or so and release > 1.4rc1 soon after. > > If you have added a new feature in the past year, please review the > release notes to make sure it's listed. > > It would be nice if we could get capture triggers in the release. There > are a couple of patches in Bugzilla (2039 and 3967); I'll try to review > them soon. > > I don't plan on maintaining the 1.0 branch after the release. If anyone > would like to take over maintenance duties, let me know. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
