Hi, Oke. Maybe you can post the bugreport numbers to the list, so we'll know what to look for.
Thanks, Jaap On 05/13/2010 09:09 PM, Atcitty, Torrey wrote: > Ok great, > > I've just submitted the second and should have the 3rd ready for submission > by the end of the day. > > Thanks, > -Torrey > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:44 PM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 > > Hi, > > I would get it done asap, so the core developers have the time to get it > processed as well. Cutoff is when the branch is made. This will happen once > we're satisfied the trunk is stable enough. We hope this happens somewhere > next > week. > > Thanks, > Jaap > > On 05/12/2010 06:45 PM, Atcitty, Torrey wrote: >> Gerald, >> >> Do you have a specific hard cutoff date for patch submissions for the 1.4 >> release? I'm currently working on trying to get at least the main AVB (Audio >> Video Bridging) protocols integrated into the main branch and it would be >> great if they made it into 1.4. The reason being alot of major companies who >> are actively developing products using AVB are eagerly awaiting the >> submission of my dissectors so they can use them as well. I've submitted one >> just yesterday which looks good based on feedback I have gotten. Another one >> incorporates really minor changes into the existing 1588 dissector >> (packet-ptp). And the final one is also a new dissector, but one my company >> has been maintaining for over a year now so it has also already been >> extensively tested. I'm asking because I want to know whether I should drop >> everything else and quickly get the outstanding two finished like today, or >> maybe by EOB Friday if at all? >> >> Thanks, >> -Torrey >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] >> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Broman >> [[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:46 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 >> >> Maynard, Chris skrev 2010-05-12 03:38: >>> Hi Gerald, >>> >>> What of the patches that have been submitted but not yet checked in? I >>> understand that it's time-consuming to review patches and that some of the >>> submitted ones may need to be re-worked and not quite ready, etc., but a >>> quick bugzilla search indicates that 111 bugs (~21% of them) have patches >>> submitted as attachments, a good portion of them likely waiting for >>> "review_for_checkin?". It would be nice if those patches that are ready >>> for integration could make it into 1.4 or those patches submitted could at >>> least be "grand-fathered" into the 1.4 branch so one wouldn't have to wait >>> an entire year (or more?) until 1.6 for the patch to become part of the >>> next stable release. It's one thing to not want to add new protocols or >>> major changes to the stable release, but surely many of them are not >>> "enhancement" bugs or major rewrites of the capture core and would be >>> suitable for inclusion. No? What are your thoughts >> I think any one on the dev list could help speed things up by helping >> reviewing patches especially if they need rework. >> Regards >> Anders >>> on this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris >>> P.S. Here's a very simple patch that would be nice (for me) to get added: >>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4722 :) >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7:41 PM >>> To: Developer support list for Wireshark >>> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 >>> >>> I'd like to create a branch for 1.4 in the next week or so and release >>> 1.4rc1 soon after. >>> >>> If you have added a new feature in the past year, please review the >>> release notes to make sure it's listed. >>> >>> It would be nice if we could get capture triggers in the release. There >>> are a couple of patches in Bugzilla (2039 and 3967); I'll try to review >>> them soon. >>> >>> I don't plan on maintaining the 1.0 branch after the release. If anyone >>> would like to take over maintenance duties, let me know. >>> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
