On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:25:48PM +0100, Tyson Key wrote: > It's very rough; and I don't know what the best way to deal with > displaying and manipulating strings of an unknown length is -
Looking at the http dissector may be of help here. > although it nicely filled a need that I had at the time (identifying > AT commands traffic amongst a proprietary protocol and other "line > noise", in order to filter them out). > > If there's any interest, I'd be willing to try and clean it up for > potential submission into mainline Wireshark. Sure, why not contribute it. I'm sure someone will find it useful at some point. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
