Right, so I've just added the latest revisions of the source files to a new
bug report (5868).

Please feel free to play with the code, and provide
comments/criticism/suggestions for improvement.

Tyson.

On 28 April 2011 15:42, Chris Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Stephen Fisher <steve@...> writes:
>
> > > If there's any interest, I'd be willing to try and clean it up for
> > > potential submission into mainline Wireshark.
> >
> > Sure, why not contribute it.  I'm sure someone will find it useful at
> > some point.
>
> Oops, meant to respond sooner, but yes, I for one would be interested.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
                                          Fight Internet Censorship!
http://www.eff.org
http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to