Right. Feel free to disregard my previous e-mail, then. :) Sorry for the inconvenience/false hope,
Tyson. On 11 August 2011 19:24, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tyson Key wrote: > > > Whilst no-one's looking into implementing support for attaching comments > to packets (as far as I'm aware); someone recently wrote a patch to enable > reading comments from pcap-ng/NTAR files, and attached it to bug #6229. > > Actually, that bug sounds more like "if a packet has a comment attached to > it, Wireshark won't even read the packet data correctly"; the fix doesn't > cause Wireshark to process the comment, it just causes it not to screw up if > a packet *has* a comment. I.e., we need to fix this before we even consider > allowing comments to be added to packets, and should backport the fix to the > 1.6 and 1.4 branches (that might still leave older versions of Wireshark > incapable of reading pcap-ng files with comments attached to them). > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
