On 06/09/2012 01:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=43176
User: cmaynard
Date: 2012/06/09 10:08 AM
Log:
Do not use BASE_NONE for FT_UINT8 types.
Fixes https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7333 (I think).
The code in epan/proto.c seems to indicate that using BASE_NONE with
FT_*INT* types should be OK when there the strings converter is supplied:
case FT_UINT32:
case FT_UINT64:
if (hfinfo->strings == NULL) {
/* Require integral types (other than frame
number,
* which is always displayed in decimal) to
have a
* number base */
if (hfinfo->display == BASE_NONE)
g_error("Field '%s' (%s) is an integral
value (%s)"
" without strings but is being
displayed as BASE_NONE\n",
hfinfo->name, hfinfo->abbrev,
val_to_str(hfinfo->type, hf_types,
"(Unknown: %d)"));
}
Where was it crashing (er, excepting out)? (There's no sample PCAP file
in that bug.)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
