Hi Chris (and others)
I add a sample (for later regression test and buildbot...) of Supported
Rates in Bug 7333 ( Attachment 8620).

Regards,


On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Maynard, Chris <
[email protected]> wrote:

> It was a guess.  The attachment in the bug report, namely "wint168.txt",
> only revealed the following::
>
>        This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an
> unusual way.
>        Please contact the application's support team for more information.
>
> I didn't see anything wrong with the
> "wlan_mgt.fixed.capabilities.dsss_ofdm" field, which was the one in which
> the above message appeared, so I went looking for nearby fields for
> potential problems, and that's when I noticed that
> hf_ieee80211_tag_supp_rates had "FT_UINT8, BASE_NONE", and the display
> filter for that field is "wlan_mgt.supported_rates", which is the last
> thing printed in the wint168.txt file, so I figured that was most likely
> the problem.
>
> - Chris
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss [
> [email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 2:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 43176:
> /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-ieee80211.c
>
> On 06/09/2012 01:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=43176
> >
> > User: cmaynard
> > Date: 2012/06/09 10:08 AM
> >
> > Log:
> >   Do not use BASE_NONE for FT_UINT8 types.
> >   Fixes https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7333 (I
> think).
>
> The code in epan/proto.c seems to indicate that using BASE_NONE with
> FT_*INT* types should be OK when there the strings converter is supplied:
>
> >                 case FT_UINT32:
> >                 case FT_UINT64:
> >                         if (hfinfo->strings == NULL) {
> >                                 /*  Require integral types (other than
> frame number,
> >                                  *  which is always displayed in
> decimal) to have a
> >                                  *  number base */
> >                                 if (hfinfo->display == BASE_NONE)
> >                                         g_error("Field '%s' (%s) is an
> integral value (%s)"
> >                                                 " without strings but is
> being displayed as BASE_NONE\n",
> >                                                 hfinfo->name,
> hfinfo->abbrev,
> >                                                 val_to_str(hfinfo->type,
> hf_types, "(Unknown: %d)"));
> >                         }
>
> Where was it crashing (er, excepting out)?  (There's no sample PCAP file
> in that bug.)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is
> intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to
> this email.  Thank you.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to