Done in r48415. Now we wait...
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/3/19 Evan Huus <[email protected]> >> >> Would anyone object to a g_warning if an extended value string has to >> fall back to linear search? It probably indicates either a typo in the >> value-string or somebody not understanding how extended value strings >> work. >> >> Didn't want to put this in without asking because if there is a reason >> I'm not aware of it would cause a ton of fuzz failures. >> >> Evan >> >> P.S. I thought of this while digging around thinking about >> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 - I'm still >> technically waiting for the original reporter to ACK it, but if anyone >> else has feedback it would be appreciated. > > > Hi Evan, > > +1 on my side. It would allow to clean the tables. > > Pascal. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
