That was fast :)

One down, ??? to go.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Anders Broman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Patch to packet-isup.c :-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Evan Huus
> Sent: den 19 mars 2013 15:54
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warning on useless extended value strings?
>
> Done in r48415. Now we wait...
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> 2013/3/19 Evan Huus <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Would anyone object to a g_warning if an extended value string has to
>>> fall back to linear search? It probably indicates either a typo in
>>> the value-string or somebody not understanding how extended value
>>> strings work.
>>>
>>> Didn't want to put this in without asking because if there is a
>>> reason I'm not aware of it would cause a ton of fuzz failures.
>>>
>>> Evan
>>>
>>> P.S. I thought of this while digging around thinking about
>>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 - I'm still
>>> technically waiting for the original reporter to ACK it, but if
>>> anyone else has feedback it would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Hi Evan,
>>
>> +1 on my side. It would allow to clean the tables.
>>
>> Pascal.
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to