On 9/7/13 5:53 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> The usual trick in this situation is to wrap the macro in a "do { MY
> CODE } while (0)" so that it behaves syntactically like a normal
> function call. I have done this in r51819, so it should work now.Is there any reason we shouldn't convert the macros in address.h (and proto.h and packet.h and ...) to inline functions? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
