On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote:
> On 9/7/13 5:53 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> > The usual trick in this situation is to wrap the macro in a "do { MY
> > CODE } while (0)" so that it behaves syntactically like a normal
> > function call. I have done this in r51819, so it should work now.
>
> Is there any reason we shouldn't convert the macros in address.h (and
> proto.h and packet.h and ...) to inline functions?
>
No objections from me. I tried tracing some of them back through git and
got lost around 2004, so I don't actually know if there was a reason to
make them macros at the time (whenever that was).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
