On 11/27/2013 10:24 PM, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> I believe you are looking at the output after tshark has been run twice, once 
> with each set of arguments.  When it runs with the first set of args, you 
> will see:
> 
> Pass 1:
>     arp: (-nVxr)
> 
> ... and when it runs with the second set of args, you will see:
> 
> Pass 1:
>     arp: (-nVxr) (-nr)  
> 
> After that completes, you'll see:
> 
> Pass 1:
>     arp: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
> 
> ... and then on to the next one:
> 
> Pass 1:
>     arp: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
>     bgp: (-nVxr)
> 
> etc.
> 

Right - and I overlooked the "-n" for the echo command - sry for the noise

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Toralf Förster
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:24 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] q: why does ./tools/randpkt-test.sh uses a bash 
> array for TSHARK_ARGS
> 
> From what I can see there's just 1 call of tshark with all args at once, or ? 
> And the output proves it too :
> (pls Cc: me directly)
> 
> 
> 
> tfoerste@n22 ~ $ cd  ~/devel/wireshark/; nice ./tools/randpkt-test.sh Running 
> ./tshark with args: "-nVxr" "-nr" (forever) Running ./randpkt with args: -b 
> 2000 -c 5000
> 
> Pass 1:
>     arp: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
>     bgp: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
>     bvlc: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
>     dns: (-nVxr) (-nr)  OK
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to