On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would vote for proto_tree_add_gsm_7bits_item() as TS 23.038 talks about 8 
> bits data and UCS2 encoding also and defines this alphabet as GSM 7bit. We 
> should not put SMS in its name as it has a much wider use in 3GPP / 3GPP2.

3GPP2 isn't GSM. :-)  (Or, speaking as a North American, perhaps that should be 
:-( - at least with LTE maybe everybody will be doing their mobile 
phone/mobile-broadband-not-called-WiMAX-etc. stuff the same way, even if, with 
LTE, you are in a maze of twisty little frequency bands, all different.  Maybe 
someday in my lifetime all mobile phones/tablets/mobile-phone-modems/etc. will 
be world phones/etc.....)

That's why I'd vote for not putting "gsm" into the name, either; it's also used 
by ANSI IS-637-A.

And a "7 bit item" could be a single 7-bit field, so I'd vote for 
proto_tree_add_ts_23_038_7bits_item().
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to