2013/12/24 Guy Harris <[email protected]> > > On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would vote for proto_tree_add_gsm_7bits_item() as TS 23.038 talks > about 8 bits data and UCS2 encoding also and defines this alphabet as GSM > 7bit. We should not put SMS in its name as it has a much wider use in 3GPP > / 3GPP2. > > 3GPP2 isn't GSM. :-) (Or, speaking as a North American, perhaps that > should be :-( - at least with LTE maybe everybody will be doing their > mobile phone/mobile-broadband-not-called-WiMAX-etc. stuff the same way, > even if, with LTE, you are in a maze of twisty little frequency bands, all > different. Maybe someday in my lifetime all mobile > phones/tablets/mobile-phone-modems/etc. will be world phones/etc.....) > > That's why I'd vote for not putting "gsm" into the name, either; it's also > used by ANSI IS-637-A. >
Well, ANSI IS-37-A refers to this encoding as GSM 7bit also ;) And as its own ANSI 7 bits encoding format (which encoding is different - starting from MSB and not LSB). > And a "7 bit item" could be a single 7-bit field, so I'd vote for > proto_tree_add_ts_23_038_7bits_item(). > That could be a trade-off :p
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
