> > *Hadrial Kaplan wrote:*
The problem is if you write a plugin for others to use, requiring them to > compile code is a high bar to expect. So if it's more than just another > pure lua lib which doesn't need c-code to be compiled, as a file/dir > accessor would need, it's tough. :( > I agree (?)... or perhaps I'm not following. ;) I *think* Guy was proposing the Wireshark Lua API included the LuaFileSystem library (or a wrapper around it) out of the box, which is something already done with Lua BitOp [1][2], so users wouldn't have to explicitly compile it themselves. Or were you referring to something else? [1] http://bitop.luajit.org/ [2] https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=blob;f=epan/wslua/lua_bitop.c
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
