Ah, the email in the source file was dead so I gave up, but that looks like the same person, I will try contacting him.
Thanks, Evan On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Didier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote >> As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we >> have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in >> packet-dcp-etsi.c. >> >> I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon >> implementations, and don't have time to write one myself. As such I >> think our best course of option is to remove the current code and >> disable that feature in the DCP-ETSI dissector. >> >> I will submit a change to that effect shortly unless there are objections. >> > Did you try to contact Phil Karn? This stuff seems to be in linux kernel and I > doubt it's GPL1, moreover he has LGPL code at http://www.ka9q.net/ > > Didier > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
