1bbe5cf by Evan Huus (eapache@...
<http://gmane.org/get-address.php?address=eapache%2dRe5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w%40public.gmane.org>):
Add correct license headers for reedsolomon code.
I got in contact with the original author (thanks to Didier for
digging up his
current email address) and verified that we could license this
under the GPLv2+.
Licensecheck finally passes!
Change-Id: I6660ef9a961626bbc4dad53e8bf767b5b9e0b3fa
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/183
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@...
<http://gmane.org/get-address.php?address=eapache%2dRe5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w%40public.gmane.org>>
Nice work ! ;-)
But there is no a new issue with epan/wslua/wslua_strict.c...
Using base directory: /home/wireshark/builders/trunk/ubuntu1204x64/build
Checking: /home/wireshark/builders/trunk/ubuntu1204x64/build
'epan/wslua/wslua_struct.c' has non-whitelisted license 'UNKNOWN'
FAILED
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, the email in the source file was dead so I gave up, but that looks
> like the same person, I will try contacting him.
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Didier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote
> >> As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we
> >> have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in
> >> packet-dcp-etsi.c.
> >>
> >> I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon
> >> implementations, and don't have time to write one myself. As such I
> >> think our best course of option is to remove the current code and
> >> disable that feature in the DCP-ETSI dissector.
> >>
> >> I will submit a change to that effect shortly unless there are
> objections.
> >>
> > Did you try to contact Phil Karn? This stuff seems to be in linux kernel
> and I
> > doubt it's GPL1, moreover he has LGPL code at http://www.ka9q.net/
> >
> > Didier
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> > mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
