On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: > That patch almost (but not quite) matches what's listed in > README.dissector (lines 1018-1024). I believe the README is correct, > in which case the patch is simply out of date (I believe it's missing > FT_AX25 and FT_VINES, and possibly others I haven't done a thorough > check).
Heh, you told me to go read that before and I forgot to check it. So this then: - FT_INT8, FT_INT16, FT_INT24 and FT_INT32 - FT_UINT8, FT_UINT16, FT_UINT24, FT_UINT32, FT_IPXNET and FT_FRAMENUM - FT_UINT64 and FT_EUI64 - FT_STRING, FT_STRINGZ and FT_UINT_STRING - FT_FLOAT and FT_DOUBLE - FT_BYTES, FT_UINT_BYTES, FT_AX25, FT_ETHER, FT_VINES, FT_OID and FT_REL_OID - FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME and FT_RELATIVE_TIME -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
