On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That patch almost (but not quite) matches what's listed in >> README.dissector (lines 1018-1024). I believe the README is correct, >> in which case the patch is simply out of date (I believe it's missing >> FT_AX25 and FT_VINES, and possibly others I haven't done a thorough >> check). > > Heh, you told me to go read that before and I forgot to check it. > > So this then: > - FT_INT8, FT_INT16, FT_INT24 and FT_INT32 > - FT_UINT8, FT_UINT16, FT_UINT24, FT_UINT32, FT_IPXNET and FT_FRAMENUM > - FT_UINT64 and FT_EUI64 > - FT_STRING, FT_STRINGZ and FT_UINT_STRING > - FT_FLOAT and FT_DOUBLE > - FT_BYTES, FT_UINT_BYTES, FT_AX25, FT_ETHER, FT_VINES, FT_OID and FT_REL_OID > - FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME and FT_RELATIVE_TIME
As far as I know without digging through the code in epan/ftypes/ to be sure. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
