Ok, I'm fine with removing them. In Debian they are needed by netexpect. BTW may I ask why are they not welcomed? 2014.06.08. 22:43, "Joerg Mayer" <[email protected]> ezt írta:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:32:12PM +0000, Wireshark code review wrote: > > URL: > https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=97e1491aa8f418a7f5bd7fdd92561d2403c187f6 > > Submitter: Balint Reczey ([email protected]) > > Changed: branch: master > > Repository: wireshark > > > > Commits: > > > > 97e1491 by Balint Reczey ([email protected]): > > > > Sync .deb packaging from Debian > > > > The sync makes CMake the build system for the .deb package > > and starts providing wireshark-qt in the wireshark-qt package. > > The package structure, i.e. the libraries are shipped in separate > > packages is also sync-ed. > > > > Wireshark-qt uses the Qt 4 libraries, but it is easy to switch > > it to Qt 5. > > While most of these changes make sense, Wireshark developers including > me have been unhappy about the existence of the -dev packages. Adding > the -dev package to the official Wireshark packaging is a no go IMO. > > Ciao > Jörg > -- > Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
