Hi Jörg, 2014-06-08 23:16 GMT+07:00 Réczey Bálint <[email protected]>: > Ok, I'm fine with removing them. In Debian they are needed by netexpect. > BTW may I ask why are they not welcomed? > > 2014.06.08. 22:43, "Joerg Mayer" <[email protected]> ezt írta: > >> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:32:12PM +0000, Wireshark code review wrote: >> > URL: >> > https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=97e1491aa8f418a7f5bd7fdd92561d2403c187f6 >> > Submitter: Balint Reczey ([email protected]) >> > Changed: branch: master >> > Repository: wireshark >> > >> > Commits: >> > >> > 97e1491 by Balint Reczey ([email protected]): >> > >> > Sync .deb packaging from Debian >> > >> > The sync makes CMake the build system for the .deb package >> > and starts providing wireshark-qt in the wireshark-qt package. >> > The package structure, i.e. the libraries are shipped in separate >> > packages is also sync-ed. >> > >> > Wireshark-qt uses the Qt 4 libraries, but it is easy to switch >> > it to Qt 5. >> >> While most of these changes make sense, Wireshark developers including >> me have been unhappy about the existence of the -dev packages. Adding >> the -dev package to the official Wireshark packaging is a no go IMO. wireshark-dev was present even before my commit, I just split it for matching the separated libraries.
Cheers, Balint ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
