Hi Evan, On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 05:07:19PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: > The implementation is a bit of a hack in that stateless dissection still > does all the stateful work, it just throws it away after each packet (so > stateless is actually slightly slower than stateful) but it seems to work > in my simple tests. > > Does this seem useful to people? Ideas for a better flag (Z just happened > to be handy)? Other thoughts, comments, suggestions?
Great, but I'd like to see also something working for *given* frame number, this would also fix issues with -R (like remove all conversations, reassemblies created by *given* frame number). About flag, I'd suggest -0 (zero-pass) ;-) Cheers, Jakub ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
