On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Evan, > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 05:07:19PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: > > The implementation is a bit of a hack in that stateless dissection still > > does all the stateful work, it just throws it away after each packet (so > > stateless is actually slightly slower than stateful) but it seems to work > > in my simple tests. > > > > Does this seem useful to people? Ideas for a better flag (Z just happened > > to be handy)? Other thoughts, comments, suggestions? > > Great, but I'd like to see also something working for *given* frame number, > this would also fix issues with -R (like remove all conversations, > reassemblies created by *given* frame number). > I don't think I understand? > About flag, I'd suggest -0 (zero-pass) ;-) > I quite like that actually :) Cheers, > Jakub > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
