On 3 July 2014 18:38, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-07-03 19:26 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com>: > > On 3 July 2014 18:20, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm OK to backport this serie of patch to 1.12 >>> >>> Other core ? >>> >>> I want also try to also add to backport 1.12 change about HTTP2 >>> (include nghttp2 lib) >>> >>> >> I wouldn't like to backport nghttp2 until we get the build for that >> cleaned up. I have the change for that ready to go, just awaiting your >> updates to the library itself. Doesn't git cope with moves though, so you >> should be OK if I make my change first? The only thing I haven't checked >> is dist building stuff, in case that needs to know the files have moved. >> > > Moreover backporting nghttp2 without merging first > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2616/ does not make sense to me. > My feeling is that http2 being still a moving draft, whatever lands in > 1.12 will be obsolete really fast... > > > +1
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
